Attorney RecordSan Diego County

Blake M. Harper · California Bar #115756

Blake M. Harper is on California’s State Bar roll, #115756, admitted in 1984; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Diego, San Diego County. 20 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Reach this attorney

Call(858) 204-8388

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#115756
License statusInactive
Admitted1984
Law schoolUniv of Utah
LocationSan Diego, San Diego County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Verified profiles & presence

Links are gathered from public sources and verified against this attorney’s State Bar record. Legal information, not legal advice.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Angley v. UTI Worldwide Inc.Counsel for the plaintiff311 F. Supp. 3d 1117U.S. District Court, Central District of California19 April 2018
Joseph Lombardi v. Directv, Inc.Counsel for the respondent549 F. App'x 617U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2 December 2013
Joseph Lombardi v. Directv, Inc.Counsel for the respondent546 F. App'x 715U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2 December 2013
In Re DirecTV Early Cancellation Fee Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff810 F. Supp. 2d 1060U.S. District Court, Central District of California6 September 2011
John Schneider v. Verizon Internet Services, IncCounsel for the appellant400 F. App'x 136U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 September 2010
In Re Remec Incorporated Securities LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff702 F. Supp. 2d 1202U.S. District Court, Southern District of California21 April 2010
In Re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff540 F. Supp. 2d 1085U.S. District Court, Northern District of California7 November 2007
Western States Wholesale Natural Gas Antitrust Litigation v. AEP Energy Services, Inc.Counsel for the appellant243 F. App'x 328U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 September 2007
Cattie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Counsel for the plaintiff504 F. Supp. 2d 939U.S. District Court, Southern District of California21 March 2007
In Re Remec Incorporated Securities LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff415 F. Supp. 2d 1106U.S. District Court, Southern District of California14 February 2006
Bush v. Cheaptickets, Inc.Counsel for the respondent425 F.3d 683U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 October 2005
In Re Remec Inc. Securities LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff388 F. Supp. 2d 1170U.S. District Court, Southern District of California17 August 2005
In Re Gupta Corp. Securities LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff900 F. Supp. 1217U.S. District Court, Northern District of California6 December 1994
In re Seagate Technology II Securities LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff156 F.R.D. 229U.S. District Court, Northern District of California12 July 1994
In Re Seagate Technology II Securities LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff843 F. Supp. 1341U.S. District Court, Northern District of California2 March 1994
In Re Daisy Systems Securities LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff132 B.R. 752U.S. District Court, Northern District of California9 August 1991
In Re Network Equipment Technologies, Inc., LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff762 F. Supp. 1359U.S. District Court, Northern District of California12 February 1991
Klein v. KingCounsel for the plaintiff132 F.R.D. 525U.S. District Court, Northern District of California14 September 1990
In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff721 F. Supp. 1133U.S. District Court, Northern District of California22 November 1988
In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationCounsel for the plaintiff108 F.R.D. 328U.S. District Court, Northern District of California28 October 1985

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The law school on the record is University of Utah.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1984 · 42 years on the roll.

20 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in San Diego, in San Diego County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, seated at San Diego.

The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Blake M. Harper’s license status, bar number #115756, and any discipline history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

278,688 attorneys · 58 counties · Official State Bar records