Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Brent Alan Whittlesey · California Bar #73493
Brent Alan Whittlesey is on California’s State Bar roll, #73493, admitted in 1976; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 43 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Reach this attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #73493 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1976 |
| Law school | USC Law School |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Verified profiles & presence
Links are gathered from public sources and verified against this attorney’s State Bar record. Legal information, not legal advice.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States ex rel. Brown v. Celgene Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 226 F. Supp. 3d 1032 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 28 December 2016 |
| United States v. Gregory Rush | Counsel for the respondent | 649 F. App'x 472 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 April 2016 |
| United States v. Daniel Nicherie | Counsel for the respondent | 585 F. App'x 385 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 October 2014 |
| United States v. Gregory Rush | Counsel for the respondent | 550 F. App'x 427 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 December 2013 |
| United States v. Horn | Counsel for the respondent | 511 F. App'x 675 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 March 2013 |
| Export-Import Bank of the United States v. United California Discount Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 484 F. App'x 91 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 May 2012 |
| United States v. Kimball Richards | Counsel for the appellant | 472 F. App'x 523 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 March 2012 |
| Export-Import Bank v. United California Discount Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 738 F. Supp. 2d 1047 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 7 December 2010 |
| United States v. Hai Waknine | Counsel for the respondent | 409 F. App'x 72 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 October 2010 |
| United States v. Nicherie | Counsel for the respondent | 395 F. App'x 336 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 September 2010 |
| United States v. Stephen Murphy | Counsel for the plaintiff | 385 F. App'x 745 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 July 2010 |
| United States v. Sareth Tath | Counsel for the respondent | 370 F. App'x 799 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 March 2010 |
| United States v. Pham | Counsel for the appellant | 352 F. App'x 189 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 November 2009 |
| United States v. Pham | Counsel for the appellant | 352 F. App'x 189 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 November 2009 |
| United States v. Berger | Counsel for the respondent | 574 F.3d 1202 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 July 2009 |
| United States v. Phu Tan Luong | Counsel for the appellant | 291 F. App'x 73 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 August 2008 |
| United States v. Tikotin | Counsel for the plaintiff | 277 F. App'x 703 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 May 2008 |
| United States v. Butler | Counsel for the respondent | 271 F. App'x 582 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 March 2008 |
| United States v. Taves | Counsel for the respondent | 265 F. App'x 678 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 February 2008 |
| Paul Revere Insurance Group v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 246 F. App'x 503 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 August 2007 |
| Geiger v. Federal Bureau of Prisons | Counsel for the respondent | 487 F. Supp. 2d 1155 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 11 May 2007 |
| United States v. Sherman | Counsel for the respondent | 229 F. App'x 520 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 April 2007 |
| United States v. Raymond P. Novak | Counsel for the appellant | 476 F.3d 1041 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 February 2007 |
| Vondette v. Conley | Counsel for the respondent | 214 F. App'x 719 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 December 2006 |
| United States v. Novak | Counsel for the appellant | 457 F.3d 981 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 August 2006 |
| United States v. Taves | Counsel for the respondent | 150 F. App'x 654 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 October 2005 |
| United States v. Feldman | Counsel for the respondent | 151 F. App'x 521 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 October 2005 |
| United States v. Butler | Counsel for the respondent | 406 F.3d 1173 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 May 2005 |
| United States v. Butler | Counsel for the appellant | 116 F. App'x 877 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 November 2004 |
| United States v. Feldman | Counsel for the plaintiff | 324 F. Supp. 2d 1112 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 16 June 2004 |
| Camper v. Benov | Counsel for the defendant | 966 F. Supp. 951 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 May 1997 |
| Boyden v. Reno | Counsel for the respondent | 106 F.3d 267 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 January 1997 |
| Boyden v. Reno | Counsel for the respondent | 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 457 | California Supreme Court | 21 January 1997 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maria Leticia Ruiz DE CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3030 | California Supreme Court | 1 May 1996 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maria Leticia Ruiz DE CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 82 F.3d 856 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 May 1996 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene CAMPER, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 66 F.3d 229 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 September 1995 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene CAMPER, Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7327 | California Supreme Court | 18 September 1995 |
| United States v. James Arthur Moorehead | Counsel for the respondent | 57 F.3d 875 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 June 1995 |
| United States v. James Arthur Moorehead | Counsel for the respondent | 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4651 | California Supreme Court | 19 June 1995 |
| United States v. Mark Allyn Tory | Counsel for the respondent | 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2406 | California Supreme Court | 3 April 1995 |
| United States v. Mark Allyn Tory | Counsel for the respondent | 52 F.3d 207 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 April 1995 |
| United States v. Michael Anthony Favorito | Counsel for the respondent | 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7246 | California Supreme Court | 28 September 1993 |
| United States v. Michael Anthony Favorito | Counsel for the respondent | 5 F.3d 1338 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 September 1993 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The law school on the record is USC Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1976 · 50 years on the roll.
43 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Brent Alan Whittlesey’s license status, bar number #73493, and any discipline history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes and present your practice the way you want clients to see it.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel278,688 attorneys · 58 counties · Official State Bar records