Attorney RecordSacramento County

Constance Lee Picciano · California Bar #66172

Constance Lee Picciano is on California’s State Bar roll, #66172, admitted in 1975; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Sacramento, Sacramento County. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Reach this attorney

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#66172
License statusInactive
Admitted1975
Law schoolMcGeorge SOL Univ of the Pacific
LocationSacramento, Sacramento County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Verified profiles & presence

Links are gathered from public sources and verified against this attorney’s State Bar record. Legal information, not legal advice.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
James Alexander v. WeidemeirerCounsel for the respondent564 F. App'x 330U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 March 2014
Claudell Martin v. Jeanne WoodfordCounsel for the respondent503 F. App'x 530U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit3 January 2013
Stearns v. FloresCounsel for the respondent465 F. App'x 680U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit10 January 2012
Elonza Tyler v. R. DavisCounsel for the respondent458 F. App'x 598U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 November 2011
Robert Smith, Iii v. James GomezCounsel for the respondent447 F. App'x 863U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 August 2011
Sy Castle v. M. KnowlesCounsel for the defendant442 F. App'x 263U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit7 July 2011
Noble v. AdamsCounsel for the appellant636 F.3d 525U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 March 2011
Noble v. AdamsCounsel for the appellant646 F.3d 1138U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 March 2011
Malone v. MartinezCounsel for the respondent377 F. App'x 621U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 April 2010
Eric Martin v. Dave WinettCounsel for the respondent371 F. App'x 852U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25 March 2010
Steven Martin v. D HoffmanCounsel for the defendant369 F. App'x 777U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit3 March 2010
Ming Ching Jin v. ForgiaCounsel for the respondent362 F. App'x 649U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 January 2010
Clark v. WarrenCounsel for the respondent356 F. App'x 940U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit14 December 2009
Jameson v. RawersCounsel for the respondent357 F. App'x 909U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit14 December 2009
Jameson v. RawersCounsel for the respondent357 F. App'x 909U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit14 December 2009
Clark v. WarrenCounsel for the respondent356 F. App'x 940U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit14 December 2009
Lewis v. AdamsCounsel for the respondent330 F. App'x 689U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 July 2009
Lewis v. AdamsCounsel for the respondent330 F. App'x 689U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 July 2009
Garrett v. RicciCounsel for the respondent328 F. App'x 528U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit6 July 2009
Garrett v. RicciCounsel for the respondent328 F. App'x 528U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit6 July 2009
Foster v. RunnelsCounsel for the respondent554 F.3d 807U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 February 2009
Morgan v. DoranCounsel for the respondent308 F. App'x 231U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit15 January 2009
Morgan v. DoranCounsel for the respondent308 F. App'x 231U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit15 January 2009
Godinez v. GomezCounsel for the respondent276 F. App'x 589U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 April 2008
Winston v. Board of Prison TermsCounsel for the respondent264 F. App'x 604U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 January 2008
Gupta v. TerhuneCounsel for the respondent262 F. App'x 772U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 December 2007
Ford v. MartelCounsel for the respondent262 F. App'x 777U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 December 2007
LaFaele v. LargentCounsel for the respondent255 F. App'x 245U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 November 2007
Jensen v. KnowlesCounsel for the respondent250 F. App'x 782U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 October 2007
Crosby v. WoodfordCounsel for the respondent234 F. App'x 816U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 July 2007
Dixon v. LavinCounsel for the respondent234 F. App'x 814U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 July 2007
Remsen v. AlameidaCounsel for the respondent234 F. App'x 585U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 June 2007
Young v. DanielsonCounsel for the respondent229 F. App'x 550U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 April 2007
Neighbors v. Clark-BarkerCounsel for the respondent225 F. App'x 660U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 March 2007
Bogan v. RunnelsCounsel for the respondent212 F. App'x 596U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 December 2006
Saunders v. FairmanCounsel for the respondent201 F. App'x 527U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit14 September 2006
LaBranch v. TerhuneCounsel for the respondent192 F. App'x 653U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 July 2006
Moyer v. AlameidaCounsel for the respondent184 F. App'x 633U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit9 June 2006
Andrews v. CareyCounsel for the respondent181 F. App'x 675U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 May 2006
Kishor v. GeaghtyCounsel for the defendant176 F. App'x 827U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 April 2006
Kishor v. GeaghtyCounsel for the defendant176 F. App'x 827U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 April 2006
Welch v. SethiCounsel for the respondent177 F. App'x 626U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 April 2006
Wade v. California Department of CorrectionsCounsel for the respondent171 F. App'x 601U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 March 2006
Sierra v. TerhuneCounsel for the respondent172 F. App'x 718U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 February 2006
Jorss v. SchwarzeneggerCounsel for the respondent168 F. App'x 825U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 February 2006
Davis v. AlamediaCounsel for the respondent155 F. App'x 325U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit12 December 2005
Hardaway v. PhillipsCounsel for the respondent156 F. App'x 15U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 November 2005
Miguel Rosas v. James NielsenCounsel for the respondent428 F.3d 1229U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 November 2005
Hamilton v. HernandezCounsel for the respondent131 F. App'x 522U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 May 2005
Driessen v. Tehama CountyCounsel for the respondent125 F. App'x 178U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 April 2005

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The law school on the record is McGeorge School of Law.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1975 · 51 years on the roll.

50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in Sacramento, in Sacramento County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, seated at Sacramento.

The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Constance Lee Picciano’s license status, bar number #66172, and any discipline history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

278,688 attorneys · 58 counties · Official State Bar records