Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Erika R. Frick · California Bar #208150
Erika R. Frick is on California’s State Bar roll, #208150, admitted in 2000; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 30 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Reach this attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #208150 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 2000 |
| Law school | Harvard Univ Law School |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Verified profiles & presence
Links are gathered from public sources and verified against this attorney’s State Bar record. Legal information, not legal advice.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Baker | Counsel for the respondent | 658 F.3d 1050 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 September 2011 |
| United States v. Demauriae Nolan | Counsel for the plaintiff | 443 F. App'x 259 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 July 2011 |
| United States v. Linda Ashiegbu | Counsel for the respondent | 419 F. App'x 770 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 March 2011 |
| United States v. Doris Anyanwu | Counsel for the respondent | 418 F. App'x 628 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 March 2011 |
| United States v. Donell Hatcher | Counsel for the plaintiff | 414 F. App'x 944 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 February 2011 |
| United States v. Ignacio Galvan-Benavides | Counsel for the respondent | 406 F. App'x 137 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 2010 |
| United States v. Dennis Lai | Counsel for the respondent | 404 F. App'x 181 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 November 2010 |
| United States v. Ruben Beltran Hernandez | Counsel for the respondent | 401 F. App'x 252 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 October 2010 |
| United States v. Juan Silva-Quesada | Counsel for the plaintiff | 384 F. App'x 678 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 June 2010 |
| United States v. Dontae Allen | Counsel for the plaintiff | 373 F. App'x 711 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 April 2010 |
| United States v. Jeronimo Madriz-Reyna | Counsel for the plaintiff | 359 F. App'x 862 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 December 2009 |
| United States v. Luis Rebolla-Sanchez | Counsel for the plaintiff | 367 F. App'x 738 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 December 2009 |
| United States v. Arsenio Huqueriza | Counsel for the plaintiff | 357 F. App'x 115 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 December 2009 |
| United States v. Watson | Counsel for the respondent | 582 F.3d 974 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 September 2009 |
| United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 545 F.3d 1106 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2008 |
| United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 513 F.3d 1085 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 January 2008 |
| United States v. Ruiz-Chairez | Counsel for the respondent | 493 F.3d 1089 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 July 2007 |
| United States v. Emile Fort, AKA Twin Edgar Diaz, AKA Hook Robert Calloway, AKA Papa v. Emile Fort, AKA Twin Edgar Diaz, AKA Hook | Counsel for the appellant | 478 F.3d 1099 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 March 2007 |
| United States v. Fort | Counsel for the appellant | 472 F.3d 1106 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 January 2007 |
| United States v. Sandoval-Mendoza | Counsel for the respondent | 213 F. App'x 624 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 December 2006 |
| United States v. Eduardo Sandoval-Mendoza | Counsel for the respondent | 472 F.3d 645 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 December 2006 |
| United States v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 473 F.3d 915 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 December 2006 |
| United States v. Davani | Counsel for the respondent | 212 F. App'x 634 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 December 2006 |
| United States v. Evans | Counsel for the plaintiff | 178 F. App'x 747 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 May 2006 |
| United States v. Tatum | Counsel for the respondent | 162 F. App'x 790 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 January 2006 |
| United States v. Hays | Counsel for the respondent | 144 F. App'x 694 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 September 2005 |
| United States v. Holloway | Counsel for the respondent | 142 F. App'x 973 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 August 2005 |
| United States v. Jamal Williams, AKA Jamal Abdullah | Counsel for the respondent | 419 F.3d 1029 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 August 2005 |
| Chaudhary v. Clarke | Counsel for the appellant | 79 F. App'x 952 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 October 2003 |
| On House Syndication, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 79 F. App'x 247 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 September 2003 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The law school on the record is Harvard University Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 2000 · 26 years on the roll.
30 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Erika R. Frick’s license status, bar number #208150, and any discipline history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes and present your practice the way you want clients to see it.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel278,688 attorneys · 58 counties · Official State Bar records