Attorney RecordSan Diego County
Francis M. Gregorek · California Lawyer
Francis M. Gregorek is on California’s State Bar roll, #144785, admitted in 1989; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Diego, San Diego County. 34 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Reach this attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #144785 |
|---|---|
| License status | Active |
| Admitted | 1989 |
| Law school | New York Univ SOL |
| Location | San Diego, San Diego County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Verified profiles & presence
Links are gathered from public sources and verified against this attorney’s State Bar record. Legal information, not legal advice.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Resh v. China Agritech, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 857 F.3d 994 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 May 2017 |
| Robert Pepper v. Apple, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 846 F.3d 313 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 January 2017 |
| Harris v. Amgen, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 646 F. App'x 531 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 March 2016 |
| Marya v. Warner/Chappell Music, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 131 F. Supp. 3d 975 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 22 September 2015 |
| Meghan Mollett v. Netflix, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 795 F.3d 1062 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 July 2015 |
| Zack Ward v. Apple, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 791 F.3d 1041 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 June 2015 |
| In re Conagra Foods, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 90 F. Supp. 3d 919 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 23 February 2015 |
| Harris v. Amgen, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 788 F.3d 916 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 October 2014 |
| Steve Harris v. Amgen, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 770 F.3d 865 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 October 2014 |
| David Defrees v. John Kirkland | Counsel for the respondent | 579 F. App'x 538 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 June 2014 |
| Nancy Graf v. Zynga Game Network, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 750 F.3d 1098 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 May 2014 |
| Steve Harris v. Amgen, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 738 F.3d 1026 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 October 2013 |
| Steve Harris v. Amgen, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 717 F.3d 1042 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 June 2013 |
| Eric Petzschke v. Century Aluminum Company | Counsel for the appellant | 704 F.3d 1119 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 January 2013 |
| Petzschke v. Century Aluminum Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 729 F.3d 1104 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 January 2013 |
| In re Conagra Foods Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 908 F. Supp. 2d 1090 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 15 November 2012 |
| In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 874 F. Supp. 2d 889 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 11 July 2012 |
| In re Apple & AT & TM Antitrust Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 826 F. Supp. 2d 1168 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 1 December 2011 |
| In Re Facebook Privacy Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 791 F. Supp. 2d 705 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 12 May 2011 |
| Harris v. Amgen, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 573 F.3d 728 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 July 2009 |
| Miller v. Ventro Corp. | Counsel for the respondent | 226 F. App'x 711 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 March 2007 |
| Mortensen v. Snavely | Counsel for the appellant | 145 F. App'x 218 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 August 2005 |
| Kivenson v. U.S. Trust Corp. N.A. | Counsel for the respondent | 113 F. App'x 273 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 November 2004 |
| In Re Syncor International Corp. Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 327 F. Supp. 2d 1149 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 6 July 2004 |
| Osher v. JNI CORP. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 308 F. Supp. 2d 1168 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 10 March 2004 |
| Osher v. JNI CORP. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 302 F. Supp. 2d 1145 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 25 August 2003 |
| In Re JDS Uniphase Corp. Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 238 F. Supp. 2d 1127 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 18 October 2002 |
| In Re U.S. Aggregates, Inc. Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 235 F. Supp. 2d 1063 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 14 August 2002 |
| In Re Quintus Securities Litigation | Counsel for the defendant | 148 F. Supp. 2d 967 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 31 May 2001 |
| In re Quintus Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 201 F.R.D. 475 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 12 April 2001 |
| In Re Autodesk, Inc. Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 132 F. Supp. 2d 833 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 14 November 2000 |
| Aronson v. McKesson HBOC, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 79 F. Supp. 2d 1146 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 2 November 1999 |
| In re California Micro Devices Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 168 F.R.D. 276 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 19 July 1996 |
| In re California Micro Devices Securities Litigation | Counsel for the plaintiff | 168 F.R.D. 257 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 2 February 1996 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The law school on the record is New York University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1989 · 37 years on the roll.
34 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Diego, in San Diego County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, seated at San Diego.
Confirm Francis M. Gregorek’s license status, bar number #144785, and any discipline history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes and present your practice the way you want clients to see it.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel278,688 attorneys · 58 counties · Official State Bar records