Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Frederick William Wentker, Jr. · California Bar #32678
Frederick William Wentker, Jr. is on California’s State Bar roll, #32678, admitted in 1962; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 17 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 18 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Reach this attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 18 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #32678 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1962 |
| Law school | Univ of Chicago |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Verified profiles & presence
Links are gathered from public sources and verified against this attorney’s State Bar record. Legal information, not legal advice.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mateo v. M/S Kiso | Counsel for the respondent | 41 F.3d 1283 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 December 1994 |
| Mateo v. M/S KISO | Counsel for the defendant | 805 F. Supp. 792 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 9 March 1992 |
| Holland v. Norwegian Cruise Lines | Counsel for the defendant | 765 F. Supp. 1000 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 26 October 1990 |
| Celestine v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. | Counsel for the defendant | 729 F. Supp. 691 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 21 August 1989 |
| Wayne A. Normile v. Maritime Company of the Philippines | Counsel for the respondent | 643 F.2d 1380 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 May 1981 |
| McCune v. F. Alioto Fish Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 597 F.2d 1244 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 May 1979 |
| Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Adelaide Shipping Lines, Ltd., Claimant-Appellee, and Salen Reefer Services Ab, and M/v Gladiola | Counsel for the respondent | 603 F.2d 1327 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 April 1979 |
| Castel v. MOLLER, AP | Counsel for the defendant | 441 F. Supp. 851 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 12 December 1977 |
| S. S. Seatrain Louisiana v. California Stevedore & Ballast Co. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 424 F. Supp. 180 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 20 July 1976 |
| Escobar v. SS Washington Trader | Counsel for the respondent | 529 F.2d 1298 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 February 1976 |
| H & H Ship Service Co. v. Weyerhaeuser Line, a Division of Weyerhaeuser Company, a Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 382 F.2d 711 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 August 1967 |
| H & H Ship Service Co. v. Weyerhaeuser Line, a Division of Weyerhaeuser Company, a Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 32 Cal. Comp. Cases 602 | California Supreme Court | 29 August 1967 |
| United Fruit Company v. Marine Terminals Corporation | Counsel for the appellant | 376 F.2d 1007 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 June 1967 |
| American President Lines, Ltd., a Corporation, and Cross-Appellee v. E. B. Welch, and Cross-Appellant | Counsel for the appellant | 377 F.2d 501 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 May 1967 |
| Arista Cia. DeVapores, S. A. v. Howard Terminal | Counsel for the appellant | 372 F.2d 152 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 February 1967 |
| Arista Cia. DeVapores v. Howard Terminal | Counsel for the respondent | 247 F. Supp. 710 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 8 November 1965 |
| American President Lines, Itd. v. John Redfern | Counsel for the appellant | 345 F.2d 629 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 June 1965 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The law school on the record is University of Chicago.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1962 · 64 years on the roll.
17 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Frederick William Wentker, Jr.’s license status, bar number #32678, and any discipline history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes and present your practice the way you want clients to see it.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel278,688 attorneys · 58 counties · Official State Bar records