Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Joann M Swanson · California Bar #88143
Joann M Swanson is on California’s State Bar roll, #88143, admitted in 1979; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 32 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Reach this attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #88143 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1979 |
| Law school | UC Hastings COL |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Verified profiles & presence
Links are gathered from public sources and verified against this attorney’s State Bar record. Legal information, not legal advice.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teresita Ching v. Alejandro Mayorkas | Counsel for the respondent | 725 F.3d 1149 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 August 2013 |
| Davis v. Astrue | Counsel for the defendant | 874 F. Supp. 2d 856 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 13 February 2012 |
| Pickard v. Department of Justice | Counsel for the respondent | 653 F.3d 782 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 July 2011 |
| Vijendra K. Singh v Holder | Counsel for the respondent | 638 F.3d 1196 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 March 2011 |
| Stimac v. WIEKING | Counsel for the defendant | 785 F. Supp. 2d 847 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 29 March 2011 |
| Adam v. Norton | Counsel for the respondent | 636 F.3d 1190 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 March 2011 |
| Hilsenrath v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 402 F. App'x 302 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 November 2010 |
| Singh v. Napolitano | Counsel for the respondent | 649 F.3d 899 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 August 2010 |
| Singh v. Napolitano | Counsel for the respondent | 619 F.3d 1101 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 August 2010 |
| Kraus v. Presidio Trust Facilities Division/Residential Management Branch | Counsel for the respondent | 572 F.3d 1039 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 July 2009 |
| Marshall v. Kubitz | Counsel for the respondent | 328 F. App'x 532 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 July 2009 |
| Marshall v. Kubitz | Counsel for the respondent | 328 F. App'x 532 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 July 2009 |
| Flores-Torres v. Mukasey | Counsel for the respondent | 548 F.3d 708 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 November 2008 |
| Barron v. Astrue | Counsel for the respondent | 262 F. App'x 848 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 January 2008 |
| Gadda v. State Bar of Cal. | Counsel for the respondent | 511 F.3d 933 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 December 2007 |
| Navarette v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 500 F.3d 914 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 August 2007 |
| R.E.M. International v. Neufeld | Counsel for the respondent | 210 F. App'x 656 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 December 2006 |
| Anton Vacek, and Golden Eagle Insurance Company v. United States Postal Service United States of America | Counsel for the respondent | 447 F.3d 1248 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 May 2006 |
| Petteruti v. Davis Grant Medical Center | Counsel for the respondent | 174 F. App'x 381 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 March 2006 |
| Schafler v. Spear | Counsel for the respondent | 135 F. App'x 939 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 June 2005 |
| United States ex rel. Rosales v. San Francisco Housing Authority | Counsel for the plaintiff | 173 F. Supp. 2d 987 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 26 March 2001 |
| Paul K. Raditch, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee | Counsel for the respondent | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2132 | California Supreme Court | 26 March 1991 |
| Paul K. Raditch, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellee | Counsel for the respondent | 929 F.2d 478 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 March 1991 |
| Richard Bowen v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration | Counsel for the respondent | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1285 | California Supreme Court | 21 February 1991 |
| Richard Bowen v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration | Counsel for the respondent | 925 F.2d 1225 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 February 1991 |
| Shirley MAHONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; Postmaster General; Oakland Postmaster, Defendants-Appellees | Counsel for the respondent | 884 F.2d 1194 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 September 1989 |
| United States v. City and County of San Francisco | Counsel for the defendant | 696 F. Supp. 1287 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 June 1988 |
| Peter KOUCKY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, Defendant-Appellee | Counsel for the respondent | 820 F.2d 300 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 June 1987 |
| Reynolds v. Brock | Counsel for the respondent | 815 F.2d 571 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 April 1987 |
| Warren v. Heckler | Counsel for the defendant | 616 F. Supp. 184 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 4 June 1985 |
| Tobias v. Heckler | Counsel for the defendant | 605 F. Supp. 233 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 29 March 1985 |
| Bobby Darnell White v. City of Richmond, Henry L. Royal v. City of Richmond, Anthony Evans v. City of Richmond | Counsel for the appellant | 713 F.2d 458 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 August 1983 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The law school on the record is UC Hastings College of the Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1979 · 47 years on the roll.
32 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Joann M Swanson’s license status, bar number #88143, and any discipline history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes and present your practice the way you want clients to see it.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel278,688 attorneys · 58 counties · Official State Bar records