Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Leon Warren Weidman · California Bar #104078
Leon Warren Weidman is on California’s State Bar roll, #104078, admitted in 1982; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Reach this attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #104078 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1982 |
| Law school | Duquesne Univ SOL |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Verified profiles & presence
Links are gathered from public sources and verified against this attorney’s State Bar record. Legal information, not legal advice.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| William Kocol v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 670 F. App'x 489 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 November 2016 |
| Tobias Frank v. Derrick Schultz | Counsel for the respondent | 808 F.3d 762 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 2015 |
| George Garcia, Jr. v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 602 F. App'x 656 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 February 2015 |
| United States v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 302 F.R.D. 532 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 1 August 2014 |
| Robert Rosebrock v. Ronald Mathis | Counsel for the appellant | 745 F.3d 963 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 March 2014 |
| Tritz v. United States Postal Service | Counsel for the respondent | 721 F.3d 1133 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 July 2013 |
| United States v. Al Klaus | Counsel for the respondent | 519 F. App'x 437 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 May 2013 |
| David Anderson v. Christopher Cox | Counsel for the defendant | 503 F. App'x 495 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 December 2012 |
| United States v. Union Auto Sales, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 490 F. App'x 847 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 July 2012 |
| United States v. Cb & I Constructors, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 685 F.3d 827 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 June 2012 |
| United States v. Kimball Richards | Counsel for the appellant | 472 F. App'x 523 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 March 2012 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Michael O. Leavitt | Counsel for the respondent | 649 F.3d 1153 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 June 2011 |
| Amelyn Banares v. Brian Demore | Counsel for the respondent | 417 F. App'x 638 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 March 2011 |
| BEACON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. v. Leavitt | Counsel for the respondent | 629 F.3d 981 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 December 2010 |
| Robert Rosebrock v. Ronald Mathis | Counsel for the defendant | 400 F. App'x 261 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 October 2010 |
| Dabo v. Holder | Counsel for the respondent | 362 F. App'x 683 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 January 2010 |
| Nigg v. United States Postal Service | Counsel for the respondent | 555 F.3d 781 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 February 2009 |
| United States Ex Rel. Serrano v. Oaks Diagnostics, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 568 F. Supp. 2d 1136 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 25 July 2008 |
| United States v. Ortega-Amaro | Counsel for the respondent | 275 F. App'x 622 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 April 2008 |
| Martinez v. Mukasey | Counsel for the respondent | 263 F. App'x 648 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 January 2008 |
| Nigg v. United States Postal Service | Counsel for the respondent | 501 F.3d 1071 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 August 2007 |
| Kaul v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 232 F. App'x 640 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 April 2007 |
| Graf v. Gonzales | Counsel for the respondent | 222 F. App'x 641 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 February 2007 |
| United States v. Orosco | Counsel for the respondent | 219 F. App'x 673 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 January 2007 |
| Haywood v. Fletcher | Counsel for the respondent | 175 F. App'x 815 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 March 2006 |
| Haywood v. Fletcher | Counsel for the respondent | 175 F. App'x 815 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 March 2006 |
| Blanton v. Wrigley | Counsel for the respondent | 168 F. App'x 238 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 February 2006 |
| Motley v. Parks | Counsel for the respondent | 432 F.3d 1072 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 December 2005 |
| United States v. Hovsepian | Counsel for the appellant | 422 F.3d 883 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 September 2005 |
| Liningham v. Gonzales | Counsel for the respondent | 123 F. App'x 770 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 February 2005 |
| United States v. Patton | Counsel for the respondent | 120 F. App'x 43 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 January 2005 |
| Hart v. Gaioni | Counsel for the defendant | 354 F. Supp. 2d 1127 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 5 January 2005 |
| Reddy v. Stotler | Counsel for the respondent | 114 F. App'x 905 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 December 2004 |
| Akhtar v. Burzynski | Counsel for the defendant | 384 F.3d 1193 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 October 2004 |
| Concepcion v. Ashcroft | Counsel for the respondent | 109 F. App'x 994 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2004 |
| Amey v. Slade | Counsel for the respondent | 110 F. App'x 764 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 September 2004 |
| Lanier v. Lindsay | Counsel for the respondent | 107 F. App'x 86 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 August 2004 |
| Counce v. Herrera | Counsel for the respondent | 103 F. App'x 313 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 July 2004 |
| Phillips v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 101 F. App'x 716 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 June 2004 |
| Mohammad Ali Faruqi v. Department of Homeland Security | Counsel for the respondent | 360 F.3d 985 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 March 2004 |
| United States v. Smith | Counsel for the respondent | 83 F. App'x 913 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 December 2003 |
| United States v. AMC Entertainment, Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 232 F. Supp. 2d 1092 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 20 November 2002 |
| Xiao Jia Luo v. Coultice | Counsel for the defendant | 178 F. Supp. 2d 1135 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 3 December 2001 |
| Southwest Center for Biological Diversity, California Native Plant Society v. Carroll | Counsel for the defendant | 182 F. Supp. 2d 944 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 31 August 2001 |
| Yunis v. United States | Counsel for the defendant | 118 F. Supp. 2d 1024 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 24 July 2000 |
| Simon v. Value Behavioral Health, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2120 | California Supreme Court | 17 March 2000 |
| In re Indefinite Detention Cases | Counsel for the respondent | 82 F. Supp. 2d 1098 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 27 January 2000 |
| United States v. Hunter | Counsel for the plaintiff | 70 F. Supp. 2d 1100 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 24 September 1999 |
| United Pacific Insurance v. United States Department of the Interior | Counsel for the defendant | 70 F. Supp. 2d 1089 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 20 September 1999 |
| City of South Pasadena v. Slater | Counsel for the defendant | 56 F. Supp. 2d 1106 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 19 July 1999 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The law school on the record is Duquesne University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1982 · 44 years on the roll.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Leon Warren Weidman’s license status, bar number #104078, and any discipline history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes and present your practice the way you want clients to see it.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel278,688 attorneys · 58 counties · Official State Bar records