Attorney Record
Ronald Charles Rachow · California Bar #62455
Ronald Charles Rachow is on California’s State Bar roll, #62455, admitted in 1974; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Reno. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Reach this attorney
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #62455 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1974 |
| Law school | California Western SOL |
| Location | Reno |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Verified profiles & presence
Links are gathered from public sources and verified against this attorney’s State Bar record. Legal information, not legal advice.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Jaime Herrera-Ramos | Counsel for the respondent | 551 F. App'x 300 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 December 2013 |
| United States v. Madrid-Cuen | Counsel for the respondent | 453 F. App'x 715 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 October 2011 |
| United States v. Madrid-Cuen | Counsel for the respondent | 312 F. App'x 949 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 February 2009 |
| United States v. Madrid-Cuen | Counsel for the respondent | 312 F. App'x 949 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 February 2009 |
| United States v. Krinitt | Counsel for the plaintiff | 310 F. App'x 131 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 January 2009 |
| United States v. Krinitt | Counsel for the plaintiff | 310 F. App'x 131 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 January 2009 |
| United States v. Alegria-Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 307 F. App'x 95 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 January 2009 |
| United States v. Alegria-Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 307 F. App'x 95 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 January 2009 |
| United States v. Mosherf | Counsel for the respondent | 280 F. App'x 578 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 May 2008 |
| United States v. Doll | Counsel for the respondent | 275 F. App'x 735 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 April 2008 |
| United States v. Miller | Counsel for the respondent | 274 F. App'x 567 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 April 2008 |
| United States v. Rodriguez-Mejia | Counsel for the respondent | 264 F. App'x 614 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 January 2008 |
| United States v. Ramos-Ruiz | Counsel for the respondent | 249 F. App'x 498 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 31 August 2007 |
| United States v. Perez-Zarco | Counsel for the respondent | 225 F. App'x 589 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 March 2007 |
| United States v. Gracian-Berber | Counsel for the respondent | 210 F. App'x 703 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 December 2006 |
| United States v. Orozco | Counsel for the respondent | 198 F. App'x 680 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 August 2006 |
| United States v. Cruz-Cruz | Counsel for the respondent | 199 F. App'x 600 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 August 2006 |
| United States v. Morales-Castro | Counsel for the respondent | 198 F. App'x 680 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 August 2006 |
| United States v. Almader-Salas | Counsel for the respondent | 199 F. App'x 597 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 August 2006 |
| United States v. John Ligon, United States of America v. Carroll Mizell, AKA Cal Smith | Counsel for the respondent | 440 F.3d 1182 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 March 2006 |
| United States v. Ramos-Ruiz | Counsel for the respondent | 154 F. App'x 664 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 November 2005 |
| United States v. Perez | Counsel for the respondent | 146 F. App'x 210 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 October 2005 |
| United States v. Osbaldo Esparza-Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 422 F.3d 897 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 September 2005 |
| United States v. Palomino-Funes | Counsel for the respondent | 143 F. App'x 763 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 August 2005 |
| United States v. Kranovich | Counsel for the respondent | 141 F. App'x 546 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 July 2005 |
| United States v. English | Counsel for the respondent | 135 F. App'x 94 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 June 2005 |
| United States v. Michael Kranovich | Counsel for the respondent | 401 F.3d 1107 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 March 2005 |
| United States v. Hubbard | Counsel for the respondent | 120 F. App'x 49 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 January 2005 |
| United States v. Ramos-Ruiz | Counsel for the respondent | 114 F. App'x 351 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 December 2004 |
| United States v. Hallmark | Counsel for the respondent | 108 F. App'x 449 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 August 2004 |
| United States v. Tavera-Perez | Counsel for the respondent | 102 F. App'x 580 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 June 2004 |
| United States v. Jose Luis Navidad-Marcos | Counsel for the respondent | 367 F.3d 903 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 May 2004 |
| United States v. Rodriguez-Horta | Counsel for the respondent | 95 F. App'x 895 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 April 2004 |
| United States v. Hernandez-Carrasco | Counsel for the respondent | 88 F. App'x 207 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 February 2004 |
| United States v. Contreras-Contreras | Counsel for the respondent | 83 F. App'x 229 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 December 2003 |
| United States v. Damen Anthony Davis | Counsel for the respondent | 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4998 | California Supreme Court | 11 June 2003 |
| United States v. Damen Anthony Davis | Counsel for the respondent | 332 F.3d 1163 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 June 2003 |
| United States v. Miguel Angel Gonzalez-Tamariz | Counsel for the respondent | 310 F.3d 1168 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 January 2003 |
| United States v. Ronnie French | Counsel for the respondent | 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11962 | California Supreme Court | 13 December 2002 |
| United States v. Ronnie French | Counsel for the respondent | 312 F.3d 1286 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 December 2002 |
| United States v. Miguel Angel Arellano-Torres | Counsel for the respondent | 303 F.3d 1173 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 September 2002 |
| United States v. Miguel Angel Arellano-Torres | Counsel for the respondent | 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9624 | California Supreme Court | 18 September 2002 |
| United States v. William Bushyhead, Sr. | Counsel for the respondent | 270 F.3d 905 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 October 2001 |
| United States v. William Bushyhead, Sr. | Counsel for the respondent | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9269 | California Supreme Court | 30 October 2001 |
| United States v. Roberto Echavarria-Escobar, Aka, Roberto Escobar Aka, Baudilo Echeveria Aka, Roberto Car Escobar-Rodriguez | Counsel for the respondent | 270 F.3d 1265 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 October 2001 |
| United States v. Roberto Echavarria-Escobar, Aka, Roberto Escobar Aka, Baudilo Echeveria Aka, Roberto Car Escobar-Rodriguez | Counsel for the respondent | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8939 | California Supreme Court | 18 October 2001 |
| United States v. Lorenzo Maria-Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8734 | California Supreme Court | 10 October 2001 |
| United States v. Lorenzo Maria-Gonzalez | Counsel for the respondent | 268 F.3d 664 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 October 2001 |
| United States v. Michelle Lyn Michaud | Counsel for the respondent | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8381 | California Supreme Court | 25 September 2001 |
| United States v. Michelle Lyn Michaud | Counsel for the respondent | 268 F.3d 728 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 September 2001 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The law school on the record is California Western School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1974 · 52 years on the roll.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Reno, NV, outside California; the California licence is unaffected by where the attorney keeps an office.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Ronald Charles Rachow’s license status, bar number #62455, and any discipline history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes and present your practice the way you want clients to see it.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel278,688 attorneys · 58 counties · Official State Bar records