Attorney RecordLitigation · San Francisco County
Arthur J. Friedman · California Bar #160867
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Arthur J. Friedman is on California’s State Bar roll, #160867, admitted in 1992; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Litigation. 11 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a litigation matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #160867 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1992 |
| Law school | Univ of Texas |
| Firm | Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cal. Charter Sch. Ass'n v. City of Huntington Park | Counsel for the appellant | 35 Cal. App. 5th 362 | California Court of Appeal | 25 April 2019 |
| Protect Niles v. City of Fremont | Counsel for the appellant | 25 Cal. App. 5th 1129 | California Court of Appeal | 16 July 2018 |
| May v. City of Milpitas | Counsel for the respondent | 217 Cal. App. 4th 1307 | California Court of Appeal | 16 July 2013 |
| Stonebrae L.P. v. Toll Bros., Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 521 F. App'x 592 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 March 2013 |
| Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton | Counsel for the respondent | 210 Cal. App. 4th 1484 | California Court of Appeal | 13 November 2012 |
| Citizens for Open Government v. City of Lodi | Counsel for the respondent | 205 Cal. App. 4th 296 | California Court of Appeal | 28 March 2012 |
| Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton | Counsel for the appellant | 48 Cal. 4th 481 | California Supreme Court | 1 April 2010 |
| County of Sacramento v. Superior Court | Counsel for the petitioner | 180 Cal. App. 4th 943 | California Court of Appeal | 29 December 2009 |
| STOCKTON CITIZENS v. City of Stockton | Counsel for the appellant | 157 Cal. App. 4th 332 | California Court of Appeal | 28 November 2007 |
| Tuolumne County Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Sonora | Counsel for the respondent | 155 Cal. App. 4th 1214 | California Court of Appeal | 2 October 2007 |
| Factory Mutual Insurance v. Estate of Campbell | Counsel for the appellant | 81 F. App'x 918 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 November 2003 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton.
A firm or employer website answers at sheppardmullin.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is University of Texas.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1992 · 34 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Litigation.
11 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Arthur J. Friedman’s license status, bar number #160867, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Litigation in San Francisco County: next on the roll
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records