Attorney RecordBankruptcy

Bruce Raleigh Ellisen · California Bar #107354

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Bruce Raleigh Ellisen is on California’s State Bar roll, #107354, admitted in 1982; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Washington. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law and Bankruptcy. 37 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 8 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a bankruptcy matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 8 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#107354
License statusInactive
Admitted1982
Law schoolUC Hastings COL
LocationWashington
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Whitaker v. CommissionerCounsel for the respondent698 F. App'x 366U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 October 2017
United States v. Ivan ForbesCounsel for the respondent672 F. App'x 675U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 December 2016
Wendy Pitts v. United StatesCounsel for the respondent668 F. App'x 774U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2 September 2016
United States v. Ivan CermakCounsel for the plaintiff592 F. App'x 565U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 January 2015
Clark v. Internal Revenue ServiceCounsel for the respondent529 F. App'x 824U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 June 2013
Rothwell, Ltd. v. United StatesCounsel for the respondent528 F. App'x 768U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 June 2013
Chow v. CommissionerCounsel for the respondent481 F. App'x 406U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25 September 2012
Pamfila Camangian v. United StatesCounsel for the respondent475 F. App'x 216U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 July 2012
Konn v. CommissionerCounsel for the respondent479 F. App'x 757U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 July 2012
Charles Tummino v. United StatesCounsel for the respondent473 F. App'x 705U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 May 2012
United States v. Stanley ZurnCounsel for the respondent432 F. App'x 686U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit10 May 2011
United States v. David WheelerCounsel for the respondent403 F. App'x 301U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 November 2010
United States v. Peymon MottahedehCounsel for the respondent402 F. App'x 246U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1 November 2010
United States v. HymesCounsel for the respondent347 F. App'x 358U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 October 2009
United States v. HymesCounsel for the respondent347 F. App'x 358U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 October 2009
George v. Internal Revenue ServiceCounsel for the respondent344 F. App'x 309U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 August 2009
George v. Internal Revenue ServiceCounsel for the respondent344 F. App'x 309U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 August 2009
McMaster v. CommissionerCounsel for the respondent320 F. App'x 681U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit26 March 2009
McMaster v. CommissionerCounsel for the respondent320 F. App'x 681U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit26 March 2009
Smith v. United States Internal Revenue ServiceCounsel for the respondent374 B.R. 420U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 July 2007
United States v. ScharringhausenCounsel for the respondent224 F. App'x 611U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit7 March 2007
Graves v. CommissionerCounsel for the respondent220 F. App'x 601U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 February 2007
Bhattacharyya v. Internal Revenue CommissionerCounsel for the respondent180 F. App'x 763U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 May 2006
Kurnik v. CommissionerCounsel for the respondent135 F. App'x 945U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 June 2005
Synergy Staffing, Inc. v. United States Internal Revenue ServiceCounsel for the respondent134 F. App'x 166U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit10 June 2005
Doing v. CommissionerCounsel for the respondent127 F. App'x 971U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 April 2005
Bratton v. CommissionerCounsel for the respondent102 F. App'x 593U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 June 2004
Nitschke v. CommissionerCounsel for the respondent76 F. App'x 137U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 September 2003
Stephen D. Pahl Louise A. Pahl v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCounsel for the respondent98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5844California Supreme Court29 July 1998
Stephen D. Pahl Louise A. Pahl v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCounsel for the respondent150 F.3d 1124U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit29 July 1998
Estate of Charles K. McClatchy William K. Coblentz and James McClatchy Personal Representatives v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCounsel for the respondent98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5059California Supreme Court26 June 1998
Estate of Charles K. McClatchy William K. Coblentz and James McClatchy Personal Representatives v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCounsel for the respondent147 F.3d 1089U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit26 June 1998
Donald J. Peracchi Judith E. Peracchi v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCounsel for the respondent143 F.3d 487U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit29 April 1998
Donald J. Peracchi Judith E. Peracchi v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCounsel for the respondent98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3181California Supreme Court29 April 1998
Anthony Theophilos Patricia A. Theophilos v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCounsel for the respondent85 F.3d 440U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit31 May 1996
Anthony Theophilos Patricia A. Theophilos v. Commissioner Internal Revenue ServiceCounsel for the respondent96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3851California Supreme Court31 May 1996
First Federal Savings Bank of Washington v. United StatesCounsel for the respondent995 F.2d 947U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 June 1993

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The law school on the record is UC Hastings College of the Law.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1982 · 44 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law and Bankruptcy.

37 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in Washington, DC, outside California; the California licence is unaffected by where the attorney keeps an office.

The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Bruce Raleigh Ellisen’s license status, bar number #107354, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records