Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Charles Frederick Preuss · California Bar #45783
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Charles Frederick Preuss is on California’s State Bar roll, #45783, admitted in 1970; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 15 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #45783 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1970 |
| Law school | Stanford Univ Law School |
| Firm | Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 35 Cal. 4th 797 | California Supreme Court | 9 May 2005 |
| Contratto v. Ethicon, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 227 F.R.D. 304 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 7 February 2005 |
| In re Paxil Litigation | Counsel for the defendant | 218 F.R.D. 242 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 August 2003 |
| In re Paxil Litigation | Counsel for the defendant | 212 F.R.D. 539 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 13 January 2003 |
| Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10393 | California Supreme Court | 14 December 2001 |
| Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 273 F.3d 1266 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 2001 |
| Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 253 F.3d 1180 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 June 2001 |
| Zinser v. Accufix Research Institute, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4955 | California Supreme Court | 15 June 2001 |
| In Re Citric Acid Antitrust Litigation | Counsel for the defendant | 145 F. Supp. 2d 1152 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 31 January 2001 |
| 7-Up Bottling Co. of Jasper Inc. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co. | Counsel for the defendant | 191 F.3d 1090 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 September 1999 |
| In Re Citric Acid Litigation | Counsel for the defendant | 996 F. Supp. 951 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 23 January 1998 |
| Bartolome E. Abuan v. General Electric Co. Monsanto Company, Bartolome E. Abuan v. General Electric Co., and Monsanto Company | Counsel for the appellant | 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6360 | California Supreme Court | 26 August 1993 |
| Bartolome E. Abuan v. General Electric Co. Monsanto Company, Bartolome E. Abuan v. General Electric Co., and Monsanto Company | Counsel for the appellant | 3 F.3d 329 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 August 1993 |
| Dorothy Carlson v. The Coca-Cola Company, a Delaware Corporation, and Glendenning Companies, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation | Counsel for the respondent | 483 F.2d 279 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 August 1973 |
| West Coast Construction Co. v. Oceano Sanitary District | Counsel for the plaintiff | 311 F. Supp. 378 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 8 April 1970 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.
The law school on the record is Stanford University Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1970 · 56 years on the roll.
15 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Charles Frederick Preuss’s license status, bar number #45783, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records