Attorney RecordCriminal Defense · Sacramento County
David A. Eldridge · California Bar #172100
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
David A. Eldridge is on California’s State Bar roll, #172100, admitted in 1994; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Sacramento, Sacramento County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Appellate Law, Constitutional Law and Criminal Defense. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a criminal defense matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #172100 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1994 |
| Law school | UC Davis SOL King Hall |
| Firm | CA Dept of Justice |
| Location | Sacramento, Sacramento County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew MacKey v. William Muniz | Counsel for the respondent | 654 F. App'x 870 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 July 2016 |
| Scott Patrick v. Susan Hubbard | Counsel for the respondent | 649 F. App'x 389 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 April 2016 |
| David Arzate v. F. Gonzales | Counsel for the respondent | 623 F. App'x 356 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 November 2015 |
| Danny Raviart v. Joseph McGrath | Counsel for the respondent | 619 F. App'x 620 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 July 2015 |
| Julius Robinson v. G. Lewis | Counsel for the respondent | 795 F.3d 926 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 July 2015 |
| David Nichols v. Jeffrey Beard | Counsel for the respondent | 617 F. App'x 721 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 June 2015 |
| Samuel Saldana v. G. Lewis | Counsel for the respondent | 597 F. App'x 436 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 March 2015 |
| Oshay Johnson v. Brian Duffy | Counsel for the appellant | 591 F. App'x 629 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 February 2015 |
| Charles Smith v. M. McDonald | Counsel for the respondent | 597 F. App'x 911 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 December 2014 |
| John Lam v. Kathleen Dickinson | Counsel for the respondent | 585 F. App'x 639 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 November 2014 |
| Erwin Cardenas v. D. Sisto | Counsel for the respondent | 585 F. App'x 566 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 October 2014 |
| Herman Sanchez v. Greg Lewis | Counsel for the respondent | 584 F. App'x 906 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 October 2014 |
| Kevin Dahlberg v. Brenda Cash | Counsel for the respondent | 565 F. App'x 657 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 March 2014 |
| Kinte Graves v. Scott McEwen | Counsel for the respondent | 731 F.3d 876 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 September 2013 |
| William Rennie, III v. Michael Martin | Counsel for the respondent | 539 F. App'x 726 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 August 2013 |
| Ruben Quevedo v. M. Kramer | Counsel for the respondent | 510 F. App'x 616 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 February 2013 |
| Tyrone Miles v. Michael Martel | Counsel for the respondent | 704 F.3d 1010 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 November 2012 |
| Truitt Moore v. Mike Evans | Counsel for the respondent | 476 F. App'x 804 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 June 2012 |
| Terebea Williams v. Deborah Jacquez | Counsel for the respondent | 472 F. App'x 851 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 May 2012 |
| Crosby v. Schwartz | Counsel for the respondent | 678 F.3d 784 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 4 May 2012 |
| Williams v. Woodford | Counsel for the respondent | 859 F. Supp. 2d 1154 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 19 March 2012 |
| Kathryn Potter v. Tina Hornbeck | Counsel for the respondent | 469 F. App'x 645 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 March 2012 |
| Cornelis Moore v. William Duncan | Counsel for the respondent | 462 F. App'x 767 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 December 2011 |
| Johnnie Peraza v. Rosanne Campbell | Counsel for the respondent | 462 F. App'x 700 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 December 2011 |
| Tony Asberry v. A.K. Scribner | Counsel for the respondent | 460 F. App'x 674 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 December 2011 |
| Jose Mendoza v. M. McDonald | Counsel for the respondent | 458 F. App'x 686 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 November 2011 |
| Raymond Coleman v. William Knipp | Counsel for the respondent | 454 F. App'x 628 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 October 2011 |
| Ronald Hurst v. Rosanne Campbell | Counsel for the respondent | 452 F. App'x 729 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 October 2011 |
| Lovell Brown v. B. Curry | Counsel for the respondent | 451 F. App'x 693 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 October 2011 |
| Jerry Pena v. Michael Martel | Counsel for the respondent | 450 F. App'x 670 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 September 2011 |
| Lonnie Shoulders v. James Walker | Counsel for the respondent | 450 F. App'x 645 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 September 2011 |
| Jerry Shue, Jr. v. D. Sisto | Counsel for the respondent | 444 F. App'x 172 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 July 2011 |
| Arthur Johnson v. James Yates | Counsel for the respondent | 443 F. App'x 247 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 July 2011 |
| Terry Kitchen, Jr. v. Tom Felker | Counsel for the respondent | 442 F. App'x 318 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 July 2011 |
| Brown v. Horell | Counsel for the respondent | 644 F.3d 969 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 July 2011 |
| Neal Tibbs v. D. Adams | Counsel for the respondent | 441 F. App'x 443 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 June 2011 |
| Robert Hebert v. John Marshall | Counsel for the respondent | 415 F. App'x 818 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 February 2011 |
| Arthur Anderson v. Cal Terhune | Counsel for the respondent | 409 F. App'x 175 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 January 2011 |
| Bruno Campostrini v. James Tilton | Counsel for the respondent | 407 F. App'x 167 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 December 2010 |
| Monterio Pinckney v. A. Scribner | Counsel for the respondent | 398 F. App'x 304 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 October 2010 |
| Phallon Harris v. Anthony Hedgpeth | Counsel for the respondent | 389 F. App'x 645 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 July 2010 |
| Ramirez v. Campbell | Counsel for the respondent | 384 F. App'x 654 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 June 2010 |
| Taylor v. Sisto | Counsel for the respondent | 606 F.3d 622 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 May 2010 |
| Collins v. Runnels | Counsel for the respondent | 603 F.3d 1127 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 May 2010 |
| Bernard Taylor v. K. Dickinson | Counsel for the respondent | 368 F. App'x 796 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 March 2010 |
| Hancock v. Attorney General of California | Counsel for the respondent | 368 F. App'x 777 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 March 2010 |
| Chaffer v. Prosper | Counsel for the respondent | 592 F.3d 1046 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 January 2010 |
| Smith v. Curry | Counsel for the appellant | 9 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11 | California Supreme Court | 8 September 2009 |
| Smith v. Curry | Counsel for the appellant | 580 F.3d 1071 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 September 2009 |
| King v. Runnels | Counsel for the respondent | 303 F. App'x 472 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 December 2008 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is CA Dept of Justice.
The law school on the record is UC Davis School of Law King Hall.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1994 · 32 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Appellate Law, Constitutional Law and Criminal Defense.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Sacramento, in Sacramento County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, seated at Sacramento.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm David A. Eldridge’s license status, bar number #172100, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Criminal Defense in Sacramento County: next on the roll
Sacramento County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records