Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Fred Haruz Altshuler · California Bar #43878
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Fred Haruz Altshuler is on California’s State Bar roll, #43878, admitted in 1969; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 38 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Altshuler Berzon et al. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #43878 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1969 |
| Law school | Univ of Chicago |
| Firm | Altshuler Berzon et al |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henderson v. Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 362 F. App'x 594 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 January 2010 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council v. Kempthorne | Counsel for the plaintiff | 627 F. Supp. 2d 1212 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 3 June 2009 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council v. Kempthorne | Counsel for the plaintiff | 621 F. Supp. 2d 954 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 27 April 2009 |
| Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. Gutierrez | Counsel for the plaintiff | 606 F. Supp. 2d 1195 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 18 July 2008 |
| Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection | Counsel for the respondent | 44 Cal. 4th 459 | California Supreme Court | 17 July 2008 |
| Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. Gutierrez | Counsel for the plaintiff | 606 F. Supp. 2d 1122 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 20 May 2008 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council v. Kempthorne | Counsel for the plaintiff | 539 F. Supp. 2d 1155 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 23 January 2008 |
| Wininger v. SI Management L.P. | Counsel for the appellant | 244 F. App'x 156 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 August 2007 |
| Aguiar v. Cintas Corp. No. 2 | Counsel for the appellant | 144 Cal. App. 4th 121 | California Court of Appeal | 27 September 2006 |
| Natural Resources Defense Council v. Patterson | Counsel for the plaintiff | 333 F. Supp. 2d 906 | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California | 27 August 2004 |
| Benjamin v. Lorenzo | Counsel for the appellant | 103 F. App'x 156 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 June 2004 |
| Viner v. Sweet | Counsel for the appellant | 30 Cal. 4th 1232 | California Supreme Court | 23 June 2003 |
| Wininger v. SI Management L.P. | Counsel for the appellant | 301 F.3d 1115 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 27 August 2002 |
| Casumpang v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 142 | Counsel for the respondent | 269 F.3d 1042 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 October 2001 |
| Tosco Corp. v. Communities for a Better Environment | Counsel for the respondent | 236 F.3d 495 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 January 2001 |
| Tosco Corp. v. Communities for a Better Environment | Counsel for the respondent | 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 49 | California Supreme Court | 2 January 2001 |
| Warden v. State Bar of California | Counsel for the respondent | 21 Cal. 4th 628 | California Supreme Court | 26 August 1999 |
| Tosco Corp. v. Communities for a Better Environment | Counsel for the defendant | 41 F. Supp. 2d 1061 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 1 February 1999 |
| Calif. Court Reporters Ass'n Inc. v. Jud. Council of Calif. | Counsel for the appellant | 59 Cal. App. 4th 959 | California Court of Appeal | 3 December 1997 |
| California Court Reporters Ass'n v. Judicial Council | Counsel for the appellant | 39 Cal. App. 4th 15 | California Court of Appeal | 17 October 1995 |
| USS-POSCO Industries v. Contra Costa County Building & Construction Trades Council | Counsel for the respondent | 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5703 | California Supreme Court | 26 July 1994 |
| USS-POSCO Industries v. Contra Costa County Building & Construction Trades Council | Counsel for the respondent | 31 F.3d 800 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 July 1994 |
| Ford v. New United Motors Manufacturing, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 857 F. Supp. 707 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 17 June 1994 |
| Ewing v. Gill Industries, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 3 Cal. App. 4th 601 | California Court of Appeal | 15 January 1992 |
| Zambrano v. Oakland Unified School District | Counsel for the appellant | 229 Cal. App. 3d 802 | California Court of Appeal | 26 April 1991 |
| Bluestein v. Skinner | Counsel for the respondent | 908 F.2d 451 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 July 1990 |
| Adolph Coors Co. v. Sickler | Counsel for the defendant | 608 F. Supp. 1417 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 8 May 1985 |
| American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Eu | Counsel for the petitioner | 36 Cal. 3d 687 | California Supreme Court | 27 August 1984 |
| Filipino Accountants' Ass'n v. State Board of Accountancy | Counsel for the respondent | 155 Cal. App. 3d 1023 | California Court of Appeal | 25 April 1984 |
| New Education Development Systems, Inc. v. Boitano | Counsel for the plaintiff | 573 F. Supp. 594 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 26 October 1983 |
| Adolph Coors Co. v. Wallace | Counsel for the defendant | 570 F. Supp. 202 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 8 June 1983 |
| San Mateo City School District v. Public Employment Relations Board | Counsel for the respondent | 33 Cal. 3d 850 | California Supreme Court | 19 May 1983 |
| Serrano v. Unruh | Counsel for the appellant | 32 Cal. 3d 621 | California Supreme Court | 28 October 1982 |
| Serrano v. Priest | Counsel for the appellant | 131 Cal. App. 3d 188 | California Court of Appeal | 27 April 1982 |
| Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of Carpenters | Counsel for the appellant | 25 Cal. 3d 317 | California Supreme Court | 14 September 1979 |
| American Federation of Labor v. Employment Development Department | Counsel for the respondent | 88 Cal. App. 3d 811 | California Court of Appeal | 25 January 1979 |
| Redevelopment Agency v. City of Berkeley | Counsel for the appellant | 80 Cal. App. 3d 158 | California Court of Appeal | 21 April 1978 |
| Crow v. California Department of Human Resources Development | Counsel for the respondent | 490 F.2d 580 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 1973 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Altshuler Berzon et al.
A firm or employer website answers at altshulerberzon.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is University of Chicago.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1969 · 57 years on the roll.
38 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Fred Haruz Altshuler’s license status, bar number #43878, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records