Attorney RecordSan Francisco County
Gilbert Eisenberg · California Bar #28900
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Gilbert Eisenberg is on California’s State Bar roll, #28900, admitted in 1959; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 24 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Law Ofc Gilbert Eisenberg. Registry record updated 18 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 18 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #28900 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1959 |
| Law school | Ohio State Univ COL |
| Firm | Law Ofc Gilbert Eisenberg |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scarff v. Intuit, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 318 F. App'x 483 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 November 2008 |
| Scarff v. Intuit, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 318 F. App'x 483 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 November 2008 |
| Roe v. White | Counsel for the defendant | 232 F. App'x 733 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 May 2007 |
| United States v. Hai Ming Mu | Counsel for the appellant | 104 F. App'x 674 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 August 2004 |
| Michael Wayne Jennings v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin | Counsel for the appellant | 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4021 | California Supreme Court | 10 May 2002 |
| Michael Wayne Jennings v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin | Counsel for the appellant | 290 F.3d 1006 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 May 2002 |
| United States v. Wayne Harrison | Counsel for the respondent | 213 F.3d 1206 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 June 2000 |
| United States v. Artt | Counsel for the appellant | 158 F.3d 462 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 October 1998 |
| United States v. Artt | Counsel for the appellant | 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7709 | California Supreme Court | 9 October 1998 |
| United States v. Kirby | Counsel for the respondent | 106 F.3d 855 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 December 1996 |
| United States v. Juda | Counsel for the defendant | 797 F. Supp. 774 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 11 June 1992 |
| United States v. Leung Tak Lun, Chico Wong, and Andrew Wong | Counsel for the appellant | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7582 | California Supreme Court | 20 September 1991 |
| United States v. Leung Tak Lun, Chico Wong, and Andrew Wong | Counsel for the appellant | 944 F.2d 642 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 September 1991 |
| United States v. Michael Frank Miller | Counsel for the appellant | 822 F.2d 828 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 July 1987 |
| United States v. Ronald M. Potts, Steven H. Larsen, Olen R. Collum, Tyrone R. Swader, and Michael J. Houlahan | Counsel for the appellant | 813 F.2d 231 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 March 1987 |
| United States v. Michael Frank Miller | Counsel for the appellant | 812 F.2d 543 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 March 1987 |
| Federal Trade Commission v. Alaska Land Leasing, Inc., and Sheldon Jaffe, Receiver/appellee v. Malcolm Kelso and Gregory Wilson | Counsel for the appellant | 799 F.2d 507 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 September 1986 |
| United States v. Michael Frank Miller | Counsel for the appellant | 769 F.2d 554 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 August 1985 |
| United States v. Felix Wayne Mitchell | Counsel for the appellant | 736 F.2d 1299 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 July 1984 |
| United States v. Winston Bryant McConney | Counsel for the appellant | 728 F.2d 1195 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 February 1984 |
| United States v. Mitchell | Counsel for the defendant | 572 F. Supp. 709 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 4 October 1983 |
| United States v. Solano | Counsel for the appellant | 605 F.2d 1141 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 October 1979 |
| United States v. Manuel Glenn Abascal, United States of America v. Paul Gordon Frakes | Counsel for the respondent | 564 F.2d 821 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 December 1977 |
| Charleston v. United States | Counsel for the respondent | 444 F.2d 504 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 June 1971 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Law Ofc Gilbert Eisenberg.
The law school on the record is Ohio State University College of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1959 · 67 years on the roll.
24 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Gilbert Eisenberg’s license status, bar number #28900, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records