Attorney Record
Leslie Earle Osborne, Jr. · California Bar #34108
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Leslie Earle Osborne, Jr. is on California’s State Bar roll, #34108, admitted in 1963; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Honolulu. 35 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is U.S. Attorney Ofc. Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #34108 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1963 |
| Law school | Loyola Law School |
| Firm | U.S. Attorney Ofc |
| Location | Honolulu |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Andrew Agard | Counsel for the respondent | 604 F. App'x 580 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 May 2015 |
| United States v. Andrew Agard | Counsel for the respondent | 596 F. App'x 560 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 March 2015 |
| United States v. David Ross Lei Ross | Counsel for the respondent | 580 F. App'x 577 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 June 2014 |
| United States v. David Ruskjer | Counsel for the respondent | 510 F. App'x 654 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 March 2013 |
| United States v. Lei Ross | Counsel for the respondent | 442 F. App'x 290 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 July 2011 |
| United States v. Paul Campos | Counsel for the respondent | 374 F. App'x 732 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 March 2010 |
| United States v. Yip | Counsel for the respondent | 592 F.3d 1035 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 January 2010 |
| United States v. Andy Yip | Counsel for the respondent | 362 F. App'x 659 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 January 2010 |
| United States v. Kakinami | Counsel for the respondent | 344 F. App'x 399 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 September 2009 |
| United States v. Kakinami | Counsel for the respondent | 344 F. App'x 399 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 September 2009 |
| United States v. Koth | Counsel for the plaintiff | 314 F. App'x 66 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 February 2009 |
| United States v. Koth | Counsel for the plaintiff | 314 F. App'x 66 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 February 2009 |
| United States v. Szabla | Counsel for the respondent | 302 F. App'x 703 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 December 2008 |
| United States v. Wood | Counsel for the respondent | 259 F. App'x 48 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 December 2007 |
| United States v. Lutz | Counsel for the respondent | 235 F. App'x 448 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 July 2007 |
| United States v. Maka | Counsel for the respondent | 237 F. App'x 225 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 June 2007 |
| United States v. Timmy Cliatt | Counsel for the plaintiff | 338 F.3d 1089 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 August 2003 |
| United States v. H. Wayne Hayes, Jr. | Counsel for the respondent | 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8846 | California Supreme Court | 2 November 2000 |
| United States v. H. Wayne Hayes, Jr. | Counsel for the respondent | 231 F.3d 1132 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 2 November 2000 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward ALLISON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 86 F.3d 940 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 June 1996 |
| UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward ALLISON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant | Counsel for the respondent | 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4596 | California Supreme Court | 24 June 1996 |
| United States v. Mett | Counsel for the respondent | 65 F.3d 1531 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 September 1995 |
| United States v. Mett | Counsel for the respondent | 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7356 | California Supreme Court | 19 September 1995 |
| United States v. William D. Mett and Marvin L. Wiseman | Counsel for the respondent | 41 F.3d 1281 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 February 1995 |
| United States v. Obet Lagumbay Ramilo | Counsel for the respondent | 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1190 | California Supreme Court | 22 February 1993 |
| United States v. Obet Lagumbay Ramilo | Counsel for the respondent | 986 F.2d 333 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 February 1993 |
| United States v. Constantine Walker | Counsel for the respondent | 940 F.2d 442 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 July 1991 |
| United States v. Constantine Walker | Counsel for the respondent | 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5911 | California Supreme Court | 26 July 1991 |
| United States v. Daniel T. Hashimoto | Counsel for the respondent | 878 F.2d 1126 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 September 1989 |
| Center Art Galleries--Hawaii, Inc. William D. Mett v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 875 F.2d 747 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 May 1989 |
| United States v. Ben Farrell Kirk | Counsel for the respondent | 844 F.2d 660 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 April 1988 |
| United States v. Lawrence Michael Duff | Counsel for the respondent | 831 F.2d 176 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 16 November 1987 |
| United States v. Guy Robin Edwards | Counsel for the respondent | 800 F.2d 878 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 September 1986 |
| United States v. Nile Smith | Counsel for the respondent | 790 F.2d 789 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 May 1986 |
| United States v. Jose Garcia Vazquez | Counsel for the respondent | 777 F.2d 494 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 29 November 1985 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is U.S. Attorney Ofc.
The law school on the record is Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1963 · 63 years on the roll.
35 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Honolulu, HI, outside California; the California licence is unaffected by where the attorney keeps an office.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Leslie Earle Osborne, Jr.’s license status, bar number #34108, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records