Attorney RecordSan Francisco County

Marvin Edward Stender · California Bar #28224

Call(415) 400-4402

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Marvin Edward Stender is on California’s State Bar roll, #28224, admitted in 1957; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. 19 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is McTernan Stender & Weingus. Registry record updated 18 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 18 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#28224
License statusInactive
Admitted1957
Law schoolUniv of Chicago
FirmMcTernan Stender & Weingus
LocationSan Francisco, San Francisco County
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
Casey v. Ohio Medical ProductsCounsel for the plaintiff877 F. Supp. 1380U.S. District Court, Northern District of California28 February 1995
Mateo v. M/S KISOCounsel for the plaintiff805 F. Supp. 792U.S. District Court, Northern District of California9 March 1992
Edwards v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.Counsel for the plaintiff716 F. Supp. 438U.S. District Court, Northern District of California16 May 1989
Risk v. Kingdom of NorwayCounsel for the plaintiff707 F. Supp. 1159U.S. District Court, Northern District of California2 March 1989
Aguirre v. S.S. Sohio IntrepidCounsel for the appellant801 F.2d 1185U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit9 October 1986
Cutter v. BrownbridgeCounsel for the appellant183 Cal. App. 3d 836California Court of Appeal24 July 1986
Arthur N. ARONSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CROWN ZELLERBACH, a Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCounsel for the appellant662 F.2d 584U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 November 1981
Gibson v. ClanonCounsel for the appellant633 F.2d 851U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 December 1980
United States v. Roy Edward Brannon, United States of America v. Fred George Cox, United States of America v. Henry Wilson, Jr.Counsel for the respondent616 F.2d 413U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 April 1980
United States v. Frank Patrick RosalesCounsel for the appellant606 F.2d 888U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 October 1979
United States v. Wendell HudsonCounsel for the appellant564 F.2d 1377U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 November 1977
United States v. WoodsonCounsel for the appellant526 F.2d 550U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 November 1975
In re KarlssonCounsel for the petitioner302 F. Supp. 628U.S. District Court, Northern District of California7 August 1969
Belships Company, Ltd. v. Pedro Jose BilbaoCounsel for the respondent390 F.2d 642U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 February 1968
Belships Company, Ltd. v. Pedro Jose BilbaoCounsel for the respondent33 Cal. Comp. Cases 839California Supreme Court27 February 1968
Hurwitt v. City of OaklandCounsel for the plaintiff247 F. Supp. 995U.S. District Court, Northern District of California17 November 1965
Allen v. United StatesCounsel for the appellant338 F.2d 160U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 November 1964
Redfern v. American President Lines, Ltd.Counsel for the respondent228 F. Supp. 227U.S. District Court, Northern District of California10 June 1963
Smith v. Isthmian Lines, Inc.Counsel for the respondent205 F. Supp. 954U.S. District Court, Northern District of California15 June 1962

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is McTernan Stender & Weingus.

The law school on the record is University of Chicago.

Admitted to the California Bar in 1957 · 69 years on the roll.

19 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.

The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Marvin Edward Stender’s license status, bar number #28224, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

San Francisco County: next on the roll

Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records