Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Patrick Lynch · California Bar #39749
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Patrick Lynch is on California’s State Bar roll, #39749, admitted in 1967; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 32 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is O'Melveny & Myers (Retired). Registry record updated 20 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 20 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #39749 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1967 |
| Law school | Loyola Law School |
| Firm | O'Melveny & Myers (Retired) |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 628 F. Supp. 2d 1114 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 15 December 2008 |
| Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 642 F. Supp. 2d 970 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 24 November 2008 |
| Rambus Inc. v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 569 F. Supp. 2d 946 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 10 July 2008 |
| Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 441 F. Supp. 2d 1066 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 17 July 2006 |
| Hynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 591 F. Supp. 2d 1038 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 5 January 2006 |
| Qwest Corp. v. City of Portland | Counsel for the appellant | 385 F.3d 1236 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 October 2004 |
| Hindin v. Rust | Counsel for the respondent | 118 Cal. App. 4th 1247 | California Court of Appeal | 24 May 2004 |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corporation | Counsel for the appellant | 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4906 | California Supreme Court | 6 June 2002 |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corporation | Counsel for the appellant | 292 F.3d 664 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 June 2002 |
| City of Auburn v. Qwest Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 260 F.3d 1160 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 July 2001 |
| City of Auburn v. Qwest Corp. | Counsel for the appellant | 247 F.3d 966 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 April 2001 |
| E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 955 F.2d 1327 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 February 1992 |
| E. & J. Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Co. | Counsel for the respondent | 967 F.2d 1280 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 February 1992 |
| Tom Hudson & Associates, Inc., and Tom Hudson v. City of Chula Vista, Sca Services Inc., and Chula Vista Sanitary Service, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 746 F.2d 1370 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 November 1984 |
| Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League | Counsel for the defendant | 519 F. Supp. 581 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 24 July 1981 |
| National Subscription Television v. S & H TV | Counsel for the appellant | 644 F.2d 820 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 May 1981 |
| Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League | Counsel for the defendant | 89 F.R.D. 497 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 17 March 1981 |
| Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League | Counsel for the defendant | 89 F.R.D. 489 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 5 January 1981 |
| Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League | Counsel for the defendant | 484 F. Supp. 1274 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 21 February 1980 |
| United States v. Imperial Irrigation District | Counsel for the respondent | 595 F.2d 525 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 April 1979 |
| Ilc Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 458 F. Supp. 423 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 11 August 1978 |
| ILC Peripherals Leasing Corp. v. International Business MacHines Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 448 F. Supp. 228 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 5 April 1978 |
| Memorex Corp. v. International Business Machines Corp. | Counsel for the plaintiff | 555 F.2d 1379 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 20 June 1977 |
| In the Matter of Equity Funding Corporation of America, Debtor. Financial Associates, a Limited Partnership v. Robert M. Loeffler, Trustee | Counsel for the respondent | 492 F.2d 793 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 January 1974 |
| Yellen v. Hickel | Counsel for the defendant | 352 F. Supp. 1300 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 27 September 1972 |
| Curtis v. Board of Supervisors | Counsel for the respondent | 7 Cal. 3d 942 | California Supreme Court | 19 September 1972 |
| Michael L. Love v. C. J. Fitzharris, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin, and the People of the State of California | Counsel for the respondent | 460 F.2d 382 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 May 1972 |
| Richardson v. Nelson | Counsel for the appellant | 444 F.2d 519 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 June 1971 |
| Rutledge v. Electric Hose and Rubber Company | Counsel for the defendant | 327 F. Supp. 1267 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 22 April 1971 |
| United States v. Imperial Irrigation District | Counsel for the defendant | 322 F. Supp. 11 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 5 January 1971 |
| Love v. Fitzharris | Counsel for the petitioner | 311 F. Supp. 702 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 13 March 1970 |
| Storey v. Garrett Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 43 F.R.D. 301 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 15 November 1967 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is O'Melveny & Myers (Retired).
The law school on the record is Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1967 · 59 years on the roll.
32 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Patrick Lynch’s license status, bar number #39749, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records