Attorney RecordBusiness Law · San Francisco County
Peter Allen Wald · California Bar #85705
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Peter Allen Wald is on California’s State Bar roll, #85705, admitted in 1979; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in San Francisco, San Francisco County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Business Law. 24 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 11 September 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a business law matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 11 September 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #85705 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1979 |
| Law school | Harvard Univ Law School |
| Location | San Francisco, San Francisco County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Miami Fire Fighters' & Police Officers' Retirement Trust v. Quality Systems, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 865 F.3d 1130 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 July 2017 |
| Inter-Local Pension Fund GCC/IBT v. Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 669 F. App'x 878 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 24 October 2016 |
| Cliff Mosco v. Motricity Inc | Counsel for the respondent | 649 F. App'x 526 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 May 2016 |
| Fresno County Employees' Retirement Ass'n v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 607 F. App'x 694 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 June 2015 |
| Mulligan v. Impax Laboratories, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 36 F. Supp. 3d 942 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 18 April 2014 |
| In re Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. Securities Litigation | Counsel for the defendant | 33 F. Supp. 3d 1107 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 26 March 2014 |
| Mallen v. Alphatec Holdings, Inc. | Counsel for the defendant | 861 F. Supp. 2d 1111 | U.S. District Court, Southern District of California | 22 March 2012 |
| Proctor v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 584 F.3d 1208 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 October 2009 |
| Bourns, Inc. v. Raychem Corp. | Counsel for the defendant | 331 F.3d 704 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 June 2003 |
| Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of Berkeley | Counsel for the plaintiff | 255 F. Supp. 2d 1116 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 7 April 2003 |
| Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of Berkeley | Counsel for the plaintiff | 208 F.R.D. 288 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 30 April 2002 |
| Qwest Communications Corp. v. City of Berkeley | Counsel for the plaintiff | 202 F. Supp. 2d 1085 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 15 November 2001 |
| Govett American Endeavor Fun Ltd. v. Trueger | Counsel for the respondent | 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3187 | California Supreme Court | 1 May 1997 |
| Govett American Endeavor Fun Ltd. v. Trueger | Counsel for the respondent | 112 F.3d 1017 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 May 1997 |
| Raychem Corp. v. Federal Insurance | Counsel for the plaintiff | 853 F. Supp. 1170 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 4 May 1994 |
| Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. ASARCO Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 24 F.3d 1565 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 28 April 1994 |
| Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. ASARCO, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 6 F.3d 1332 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 September 1993 |
| Louisiana-Pacific Corp. v. ASARCO, Inc. | Counsel for the appellant | 5 F.3d 431 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 September 1993 |
| North Coast Industries v. Jason Maxwell, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 972 F.2d 1031 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 6 August 1992 |
| North Coast Industries v. Jason Maxwell, Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6849 | California Supreme Court | 6 August 1992 |
| In Re Daisy Systems Securities Litigation | Counsel for the defendant | 132 B.R. 752 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 9 August 1991 |
| Seawinds Ltd. v. Nedlloyd Lines, B.V. | Counsel for the defendant | 80 B.R. 181 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 24 June 1987 |
| Harris v. Peddle | Counsel for the appellant | 792 F.2d 862 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 June 1986 |
| Public Utility Commissioner v. Bonneville Power Administration | Counsel for the respondent | 767 F.2d 622 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 August 1985 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The law school on the record is Harvard University Law School.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1979 · 47 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Business Law.
24 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in San Francisco, in San Francisco County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, seated at San Francisco.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Peter Allen Wald’s license status, bar number #85705, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Business Law in San Francisco County: next on the roll
San Francisco County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records