Attorney RecordLos Angeles County
Richard Marmaro · California Bar #91387
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Richard Marmaro is on California’s State Bar roll, #91387, admitted in 1980; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County. 26 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a legal matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #91387 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1980 |
| Law school | New York Univ SOL |
| Firm | Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP |
| Location | Los Angeles, Los Angeles County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States v. Douglas Decinces | Counsel for the appellant | 808 F.3d 785 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 December 2015 |
| Robert Eringer v. Principality of Monaco | Counsel for the respondent | 533 F. App'x 703 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 July 2013 |
| Blum v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc. | Counsel for the respondent | 712 F.3d 1349 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 11 April 2013 |
| United States v. Ruehle | Counsel for the respondent | 583 F.3d 600 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 September 2009 |
| Roth v. Reyes | Counsel for the respondent | 567 F.3d 1077 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 June 2009 |
| United States v. Nicholas | Counsel for the defendant | 606 F. Supp. 2d 1109 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 1 April 2009 |
| United States v. Nicholas | Counsel for the defendant | 594 F. Supp. 2d 1116 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 December 2008 |
| Securities & Exchange Commission v. Nicholas | Counsel for the defendant | 569 F. Supp. 2d 1065 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 4 August 2008 |
| Securities & Exchange Commission v. Talbot | Counsel for the respondent | 530 F.3d 1085 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 June 2008 |
| Girardi v. Dow Chemical Co. | Counsel for the appellant | 528 F.3d 1131 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 9 June 2008 |
| Securities & Exchange Commission v. Reyes | Counsel for the defendant | 491 F. Supp. 2d 906 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 17 May 2007 |
| United States v. Reyes | Counsel for the defendant | 239 F.R.D. 591 | U.S. District Court, Northern District of California | 22 December 2006 |
| U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Talbot | Counsel for the defendant | 430 F. Supp. 2d 1029 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 14 February 2006 |
| Securities & Exchange Commission v. Yuen | Counsel for the defendant | 221 F.R.D. 631 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 10 June 2004 |
| Rex K. DeGEORGE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent | Counsel for the petitioner | 219 F.3d 930 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 18 July 2000 |
| Rex K. DeGEORGE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent | Counsel for the petitioner | 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5940 | California Supreme Court | 18 July 2000 |
| Solid State Devices, Inc. v. United States | Counsel for the appellant | 130 F.3d 853 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 November 1997 |
| United States v. Thomas Spiegel | Counsel for the appellant | 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3526 | California Supreme Court | 13 May 1993 |
| United States v. Thomas Spiegel | Counsel for the appellant | 995 F.2d 138 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 13 May 1993 |
| In re Application for an Order for Judicial Assistance in a Foreign Proceeding in the High Court of Justice | Counsel for the respondent | 147 F.R.D. 223 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 29 March 1993 |
| United States v. John Hayden | Counsel for the respondent | 860 F.2d 1483 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 3 November 1988 |
| United States v. Lucille Ann Des Jardins | Counsel for the respondent | 772 F.2d 578 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 26 September 1985 |
| United States v. George Hoelker, United States of America v. Douglas Paul Linn | Counsel for the respondent | 765 F.2d 1422 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 July 1985 |
| United States v. Lucille Ann Des Jardins | Counsel for the respondent | 747 F.2d 499 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 September 1984 |
| United States v. Robert Brutzman | Counsel for the respondent | 731 F.2d 1449 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 1 May 1984 |
| United States v. Sandy E. Gibbs | Counsel for the respondent | 704 F.2d 464 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 April 1983 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP.
A firm or employer website answers at skadden.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.
The law school on the record is New York University School of Law.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1980 · 46 years on the roll.
26 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Los Angeles, in Los Angeles County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, seated at Los Angeles.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Richard Marmaro’s license status, bar number #91387, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Los Angeles County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records