Attorney RecordCriminal Defense · Orange County
Stephanie A. Miyoshi · California Bar #190394
Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.
Stephanie A. Miyoshi is on California’s State Bar roll, #190394, admitted in 1997; license status: inactive as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Irvine, Orange County. Practice areas listed in the registry: Criminal Defense. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. The employer on the official record is Ofc Attorney General. Registry record updated 19 August 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.
This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.
Have a criminal defense matter? Submit your case for review.
Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.
In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.
Submit your case for reviewLegal information, not legal advice
Registry verification
Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 19 August 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.
10+ published court opinions may name you. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →
The record
| State Bar number | #190394 |
|---|---|
| License status | Inactive |
| Admitted | 1997 |
| Law school | Loyola Law School |
| Firm | Ofc Attorney General |
| Location | Irvine, Orange County |
| Registry identity | Official State Bar record |
Practice areas
Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.
Understand your options
Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.
Verified profiles & presence
Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.
Cases of record
From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.
| Case | Appeared for | Citation | Court | Decided |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| People v. Julian | Counsel for the respondent | 34 Cal. App. 5th 878 | California Court of Appeal | 29 April 2019 |
| People v. Ramirez | Counsel for the respondent | 34 Cal. App. 5th 823 | California Court of Appeal | 26 April 2019 |
| People v. Bipialaka | Counsel for the respondent | 34 Cal. App. 5th 455 | California Court of Appeal | 17 April 2019 |
| People v. Rocha | Counsel for the respondent | 32 Cal. App. 5th 352 | California Court of Appeal | 19 February 2019 |
| People v. Hicks | Counsel for the respondent | 4 Cal. 5th 203 | California Supreme Court | 28 December 2017 |
| Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman | Counsel for the respondent | 861 F.3d 956 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 June 2017 |
| People v. Tatum CA2/1 | Counsel for the respondent | 4 Cal. App. 5th 1125 | California Court of Appeal | 3 October 2016 |
| Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman | Counsel for the respondent | 834 F.3d 1078 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 25 August 2016 |
| Kevin Jones, Jr. v. K. Harrington | Counsel for the respondent | 829 F.3d 1128 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 22 July 2016 |
| People v. Hicks | Counsel for the respondent | 243 Cal. App. 4th 343 | California Court of Appeal | 23 December 2015 |
| Adrian Gurrola v. Mike McDonald | Counsel for the respondent | 627 F. App'x 601 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 October 2015 |
| People v. Johnson | Counsel for the respondent | 234 Cal. App. 4th 1432 | California Court of Appeal | 10 March 2015 |
| Adrian Gurrola v. Mike McDonald | Counsel for the respondent | 575 F. App'x 743 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 May 2014 |
| People v. Williams | Counsel for the respondent | 56 Cal. 4th 630 | California Supreme Court | 6 May 2013 |
| People v. Leiva | Counsel for the respondent | 56 Cal. 4th 498 | California Supreme Court | 8 April 2013 |
| Andres Gonzalez v. Edward J. Caden | Counsel for the respondent | 513 F. App'x 672 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 21 March 2013 |
| Daniel Gonzales v. Michael Stainer | Counsel for the respondent | 507 F. App'x 704 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 8 February 2013 |
| Jermaine Moore v. Kelly Harrington | Counsel for the respondent | 504 F. App'x 573 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 January 2013 |
| People v. Watkins | Counsel for the respondent | 55 Cal. 4th 999 | California Supreme Court | 17 December 2012 |
| People v. Rocco | Counsel for the respondent | 209 Cal. App. 4th 1571 | California Court of Appeal | 16 October 2012 |
| People v. Sorrels | Counsel for the respondent | 208 Cal. App. 4th 1155 | California Court of Appeal | 24 August 2012 |
| John Mitchell v. Matthew Martel, Acting Warden | Counsel for the respondent | 452 F. App'x 737 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 October 2011 |
| People v. Stipo | Counsel for the respondent | 195 Cal. App. 4th 664 | California Court of Appeal | 16 May 2011 |
| People v. Mendez | Counsel for the respondent | 188 Cal. App. 4th 47 | California Court of Appeal | 1 September 2010 |
| People v. Concha | Counsel for the respondent | 182 Cal. App. 4th 1072 | California Court of Appeal | 31 March 2010 |
| Gonzales v. Adams | Counsel for the respondent | 370 F. App'x 867 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 12 March 2010 |
| Gonzalez v. Caden | Counsel for the respondent | 357 F. App'x 900 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 2009 |
| Gonzalez v. Caden | Counsel for the respondent | 357 F. App'x 900 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 December 2009 |
| People v. Concha | Counsel for the respondent | 47 Cal. 4th 653 | California Supreme Court | 12 November 2009 |
| Williams v. Runnels | Counsel for the respondent | 640 F. Supp. 2d 1203 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 30 July 2009 |
| Calzadillas v. Martel | Counsel for the respondent | 324 F. App'x 576 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 April 2009 |
| Calzadillas v. Martel | Counsel for the respondent | 324 F. App'x 576 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 17 April 2009 |
| Johnson v. Adams | Counsel for the respondent | 318 F. App'x 538 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 March 2009 |
| Johnson v. Adams | Counsel for the respondent | 318 F. App'x 538 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 10 March 2009 |
| People v. Sinclair | Counsel for the respondent | 166 Cal. App. 4th 848 | California Court of Appeal | 9 September 2008 |
| People v. Concha | Counsel for the respondent | 160 Cal. App. 4th 1441 | California Court of Appeal | 18 March 2008 |
| Alvarado v. Small | Counsel for the respondent | 228 F. App'x 663 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 30 March 2007 |
| People v. Woods | Counsel for the respondent | 146 Cal. App. 4th 106 | California Court of Appeal | 30 November 2006 |
| Roberson v. Adams | Counsel for the respondent | 170 F. App'x 462 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 7 March 2006 |
| People v. Vasquez | Counsel for the respondent | 136 Cal. App. 4th 1176 | California Court of Appeal | 15 February 2006 |
| Terry Darnell Williams v. D.L. Runnels, Warden Bill Lockyer | Counsel for the respondent | 432 F.3d 1102 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 5 January 2006 |
| Banyard v. Duncan | Counsel for the respondent | 342 F. Supp. 2d 865 | U.S. District Court, Central District of California | 4 October 2004 |
| People v. Hernandez | Counsel for the respondent | 33 Cal. 4th 1040 | California Supreme Court | 9 August 2004 |
| Vaughn v. Cambra | Counsel for the respondent | 103 F. App'x 276 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 July 2004 |
| Washington v. Brown | Counsel for the respondent | 105 F. App'x 165 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 23 June 2004 |
| Picazo v. Alameida | Counsel for the respondent | 90 F. App'x 512 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 19 February 2004 |
| Ruby v. Roe | Counsel for the respondent | 86 F. App'x 289 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 14 January 2004 |
| Giamella v. Henry | Counsel for the respondent | 83 F. App'x 924 | U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit | 15 December 2003 |
| People v. Adan | Counsel for the respondent | 77 Cal. App. 4th 390 | California Court of Appeal | 4 January 2000 |
| People v. Pecci | Counsel for the respondent | 72 Cal. App. 4th 1500 | California Court of Appeal | 23 June 1999 |
Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.
Each case name opens the published opinion it comes from. Is a case not this attorney’s? The attorney can claim this profile and mark it as not theirs, which removes it from this page; anyone can report an error through Help & Support.
On the official record
The employer on the official record is Ofc Attorney General.
The law school on the record is Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.
Admitted to the California Bar in 1997 · 29 years on the roll.
Practice areas on the record: Criminal Defense.
50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.
The address of record is in Irvine, in Orange County, where matters are ordinarily heard at the Superior Court of California, County of Orange, seated at Santa Ana.
The official licence status is inactive. Verify current eligibility with the State Bar.
Confirm Stephanie A. Miyoshi’s license status, bar number #190394, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.
Legal information, not legal advice.
On the record nearby
Criminal Defense in Orange County: next on the roll
Orange County: next on the roll
Listed alphabetically by last name, continuing from this record. Not a recommendation.
For Attorneys
Your profile is already on the roll. Make it yours.
Every California attorney is indexed here from the official State Bar roll, including you. Verify your identity in minutes, present your practice the way you want clients to see it, and unlock the Referral Exchange · send and receive matters with verified attorneys, fees divided 100% between counsel under CRPC 1.5.1.
Claim My ProfileFree to claim · referrals free at every level · identity verified against the State Bar record
Read the record. Then decide.
Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.
Find Your Counsel279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records