Attorney RecordCriminal Defense

Mark S. Kokanovich, attorney at Ballard Spahr in Phoenix, AZ

Mark S. Kokanovich · Criminal Defense Attorney

Call(602) 798-5532

Can’t reach them, or not sure who to call? Submit your case for review · attorneys who practice in your area read it and may send you terms. Free; your details stay masked until you choose.

Mark S. Kokanovich is on California’s State Bar roll, #230286, admitted in 2004; license status: active as of 22 July 2026. The address of record is in Phoenix. Practice areas listed in the registry: Criminal Defense. This profile lists one third-party recognition, in Chambers USA 2026, as published by Chambers and Partners. 50 case appearances are listed on this profile. Registry record updated 7 October 2026; license information comes from the State Bar.

This profile has not yet been claimed. Verify current license status at the State Bar before retaining counsel; the choice is always yours.

Have a criminal defense matter? Submit your case for review.

Open a free case file, choose how attorneys may contact you, and review any terms they send. You decide whom to contact and whether to proceed.

In the last 30 days attorneys have read 27 filed matters on the registry and sent 1 proposal.

Submit your case for review

Legal information, not legal advice

Registry verification

Official State Bar recordLicense facts sourced from the State Bar of California.

Verified against official State Bar of California records · record last updated 7 October 2026. Contact information on this page comes from the public record and is shown free, the registry never paywalls it.

2 findings about you await your confirmation. Claim your profile to review and add the ones that are yours →

The record

State Bar number#230286
License statusActive
Admitted2004
Law schoolYale Univ
FirmBallard Spahr
LocationPhoenix
Registry identityOfficial State Bar record

Practice areas

Practice areas are self-reported to the State Bar or added by the attorney; listing one is not a State Bar certification.

Understand your options

Free California worksheets to organize the facts before speaking with an attorney.

Verified profiles & presence

Firm websiteballardspahr.comFirm or office link; not an individual ratingSource: your firm's website
State Bar recordapps.calbar.ca.govSource profile; check who and what it coversSource: the State Bar record

Professional identity links come from public sources or this attorney. Review-site ratings belong to their named source and may cover a firm or office. CAR does not combine them into an attorney rating.

Cases of record

From published opinions naming this attorney as counsel. The attorney has not yet confirmed these records.

CaseAppeared forCitationCourtDecided
United States v. JP Morgan Chase Bank AccountCounsel for the respondent835 F.3d 1159U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit1 September 2016
United States v. Ibrahim BareCounsel for the respondent806 F.3d 1011U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 November 2015
United States v. Benjamin LowensteinCounsel for the plaintiff623 F. App'x 362U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 November 2015
United States v. Geno PlummerCounsel for the plaintiff619 F. App'x 628U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 August 2015
United States v. Marcos VelazquezCounsel for the respondent610 F. App'x 713U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit29 July 2015
United States v. Dennis MahonCounsel for the respondent793 F.3d 1115U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 July 2015
United States v. MahonCounsel for the respondent804 F.3d 946U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 July 2015
United States v. Damien ZepedaCounsel for the plaintiff792 F.3d 1103U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit7 July 2015
United States v. Francisco Rosales-HernandezCounsel for the respondent600 F. App'x 573U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 April 2015
United States v. Jesus Alvarez-UlloaCounsel for the respondent784 F.3d 558U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 April 2015
United States v. Huizar-FloresCounsel for the respondent592 F. App'x 608U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 February 2015
United States v. Angel Ocampo-SotoCounsel for the respondent592 F. App'x 600U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 February 2015
Black Mesa Water Coalition v. Sally JewellCounsel for the respondent776 F.3d 1055U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit26 January 2015
United States v. Idan GreenbergCounsel for the respondent596 F. App'x 550U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit9 January 2015
United States v. Randolph RodmanCounsel for the respondent596 F. App'x 548U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit9 January 2015
United States v. FranksonCounsel for the plaintiff585 F. App'x 734U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 November 2014
United States v. Guillermo Atondo-CastanedaCounsel for the respondent585 F. App'x 589U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 October 2014
United States v. Indalecio Castro-PonceCounsel for the respondent770 F.3d 819U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 October 2014
United States v. Marlon MooreCounsel for the respondent770 F.3d 809U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 October 2014
United States v. $311,229.00 in U.S. CurrencyCounsel for the plaintiff585 F. App'x 549U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 October 2014
United States v. Alfredo Mendiola-BorboaCounsel for the respondent584 F. App'x 897U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit2 October 2014
United States v. Jose Medina-MolinaCounsel for the plaintiff584 F. App'x 839U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 September 2014
United States v. Jose Casillas-OchoaCounsel for the respondent584 F. App'x 347U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit29 July 2014
United States v. Garcia-AvitiaCounsel for the respondent583 F. App'x 826U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 July 2014
United States v. Henry Garcia-De LeonCounsel for the plaintiff583 F. App'x 827U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit28 July 2014
United States v. Jesus Sosa-OrtizCounsel for the respondent582 F. App'x 767U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit10 July 2014
United States v. Koy WilliamsCounsel for the respondent581 F. App'x 685U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 June 2014
United States v. Esequiel Lopez-BeltranCounsel for the respondent581 F. App'x 637U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 June 2014
United States v. Juan Torrecillas-TorresCounsel for the respondent581 F. App'x 639U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 June 2014
United States v. Gaspar Arroyos-SernaCounsel for the respondent581 F. App'x 650U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 June 2014
United States v. Arce-RodriguezCounsel for the respondent579 F. App'x 562U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 June 2014
United States v. Juan Zapata-MarquezCounsel for the plaintiff579 F. App'x 559U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit17 June 2014
United States v. Douglas GibsonCounsel for the respondent575 F. App'x 785U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 May 2014
United States v. Mario Mata-CastroCounsel for the plaintiff571 F. App'x 625U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 April 2014
United States v. Lucio Ramirez-MataCounsel for the plaintiff568 F. App'x 503U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit11 April 2014
United States v. Zamudio-DuranCounsel for the respondent558 F. App'x 769U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 February 2014
United States v. Timothy YazzieCounsel for the respondent743 F.3d 1278U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit27 February 2014
United States v. Eduardo Garcia-CortezCounsel for the plaintiff557 F. App'x 684U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit26 February 2014
United States v. Jorge Robles-RetizCounsel for the respondent553 F. App'x 720U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 January 2014
United States v. Michael KappCounsel for the respondent552 F. App'x 773U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 January 2014
United States v. BabbiniCounsel for the respondent551 F. App'x 316U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit30 December 2013
United States v. $79,010 in U.S. CurrencyCounsel for the respondent550 F. App'x 462U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit20 December 2013
United States v. AtondoCounsel for the respondent552 F. App'x 622U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit6 December 2013
United States v. Brandon HullabyCounsel for the plaintiff736 F.3d 1260U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 December 2013
United States v. Ricardo MontalvoCounsel for the respondent544 F. App'x 761U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 November 2013
United States v. Antoinne FeatherstoneCounsel for the respondent540 F. App'x 791U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit3 October 2013
United States v. Luis RodriguezCounsel for the respondent531 F. App'x 798U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 June 2013
United States v. Patrick CarbyCounsel for the respondent531 F. App'x 803U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 June 2013
United States v. DowningCounsel for the plaintiff530 F. App'x 645U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 June 2013
United States v. Manuela Gonzalez-GonzalezCounsel for the respondent523 F. App'x 460U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 June 2013

Appearances in published opinions, drawn from public court records. Cases of record are matters of public record and are not a representation of results; past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Legal information, not legal advice.

Third-party recognitions

Third-party recognitions, as published by their issuers. CAR does not rank attorneys. How to read a Chambers recognition.

Chambers USA 2026, Band 3, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations (Arizona). As published by Chambers and Partners; CAR does not rank attorneys. Firm at the time: Ballard Spahr LLP.

Published source · Methodology

Published by Chambers and Partners and shown under licence. Not yet confirmed by the attorney. Last checked 3 October 2026.

Are you this attorney? Claim this record to confirm, correct or remove a recognition →

Issuers set their own criteria and may sell marketing products to the firms they recognize. A recognition is not a guarantee of any result. The California Attorney Registry is not affiliated with Chambers and Partners.

On the official record

The employer on the official record is Ballard Spahr.

A firm or employer website answers at ballardspahr.com, the domain of the email address on the State Bar record.

The law school on the record is Yale Law School.

Admitted to the California Bar in 2004 · 22 years on the roll.

Practice areas on the record: Criminal Defense.

50 appearances as counsel in published opinions are on this record.

The address of record is in Phoenix, AZ, outside California; the California licence is unaffected by where the attorney keeps an office.

Verify before you hire

Confirm Mark S. Kokanovich’s license status, bar number #230286, and official disciplinary or administrative history directly with the State Bar of California at apps.calbar.ca.gov before retaining counsel. This profile does not reproduce the complete official history; missing information does not mean no discipline. This page indexes public-record data and identifies verified claims; it does not rate attorney quality or predict results.

Legal information, not legal advice.

On the record nearby

Read the record. Then decide.

Describe your matter once, review the verified records, and place the call; the choice is always yours.

Find Your Counsel

279,000+ attorney records · 58 counties · Official State Bar records